United States v. Algie Leonard Olsen
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Algie Leonard Olsen appeals from his conviction of fraud by wire and aiding and abetting fraud by wire, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2. We affirm.
Olsen first contends that since more than sixty days elapsed between the time when a mistrial was declared in his first trial and the time when his second trial, which resulted in conviction, commenced, he was not accorded a speedy trial as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3161(e). He therefore contends that, under 18 U.S.C. § 3162,, the indictment against him should have been dismissed.
Olsen’s first trial began on May 25, 1978 and continued through…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Lushrie Jardan and Harold HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Thomas Patrick BuffingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
3Cited by10 opinions
- Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- United States v. Rita M. LavelleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Edward LindseyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Bass v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- Brent Ellis Erickson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.