Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Thomas Solvent Co.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 5, 1989No. K-86-164; K-86-167PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENSLEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, the United States and the State of Michigan, move this Court for entry of a partial consent decree with defendant Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company (“Grand Trunk”). Grand Trunk concurs in the motion and requests that the consent decree be entered. Responding to plaintiffs’ motion as well is a group of approximately ninety corporations who have been permitted to submit an amici curiae brief on this motion. The amici are essentially those corporations which may incur liability for contamination at the Annex, one of four locations involved in…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Williams v. VukovichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Cannons Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  3. Kelley v. Thomas Solvent Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989
  4. Arizona v. Motorola, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1991
  5. Comerica Bank-Detroit v. Allen Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API