Legal Opinion
Merhav Ampal Group, Ltd. v. Merhav (M.N.F.) Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 9, 2017No. 16-979-bkPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Defendants Merhav (M.N.F.) Limited and Yosef Maiman (collectively “Merhav”) appeal from the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Merhav Ampal Group, Ltd., (“MAG”) arguing that the bankruptcy court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the adversary proceeding.1 Specifically, defendants argue that there was no basis for “related to” jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) because there was - no preponderance showing that a recovery by MAG, which is in the process of winding up, could conceivably affect the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Higazy v. TempletonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Parmalat Capital Finance Ltd. v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Pfizer Inc. v. Law Offices of Peter G. Angelos (In Re Quigley Co.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Kolinsky v. Russ (In Re Kolinsky)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- 45 John Ny, LLC v. HS 45 John LLC (In re HS 45 John LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2018