Legal Opinion

Basedan v. Jackson

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 1, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment reversed without costs and action dismissed.

Substantial justice was not done between the parties in accordance with the rules and principles of substantive law (CCA 1804, 1807) in this small claims action seeking payment of per diem rent for the defendant seller’s holding over past the date upon which possession of the real property at issue was to be delivered to the plaintiff buyer. The $800 claim at issue herein should have been raised in a prior small claims action between plaintiffs wife (also a party to the contract of sale) and defendant herein…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. LockwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Schwartzreich v. E.P.C. Carting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. 67-25 Dartmouth Street Corp. v. SyllmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Joshua A. Becker, M.D. & Associates, P.C. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API