Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 3, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
32 N.J. Super. 23 (1954)
107 A.2d 668
ALBERT D. PETERSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued August 16, 1954.
Decided September 3, 1954.
Before Judges SPEAKMAN, HEGARTY and CONLON.
Mr. A. Leo Bohl argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Nathan Rabinowitz argued the cause for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by SPEAKMAN, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).
On February 23, 1950 defendant issued to the plaintiff its policy of insurance insuring him against loss resulting directly and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Foglesong v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Mut. L. Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Bryant.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- Trusky v. Ford Motor Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Decker v. George W. Smith & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
- Nickolopulos v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kaufman v. Provident Life & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Leitner v. BraenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Nye v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Zeller v. Markson Rosenthal & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Lauren v. AUTOMOBILE OWNERS'ASSOCIATIONSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958