Union Electric Light & Power Co. v. Dawson
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
There seems to be not milch controversy over the facts in this ease. , As'provided by Rule 22 of this'court the parties have submitted this case to us under an agreed .statement of the c'ause of action. We shall refer to and set out such parts of the agreed statement as we may deem nécessary in the determination of this cause.
The parties concede that the Only question at issue here is whether or hot the trial court erred in! entering a several judginent Of $340 against each of the five defendants named in the judgment, insfead of entering a joint judgment against the five defendants for $1700.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- State Ex Rel. Union Electric Light & Power Co. v. BruceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Columbia v. BaurichterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Nichols v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. LynchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- State ex rel. Missouri Water Co. v. BostianSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- State ex rel. Missouri Water Co. v. BostianSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955