Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dworken v. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1936No. 25714PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Relators seek a writ of mandamus from this court ordering the “judges of the Court of Common Pleas- of Cuyahoga county, to appoint a stenographic reporter as official shorthand reporter and assistants as provided by law.”

■ The case was submitted upon petition and answer, together with briefs and oral arguments of counsel.

Relators base their action entirely on Sections 1546 and 1547, General Code, which they contend are mandatory because public rights and interests are concerned. These sections are as follows:

“Sec. 1546. When in its opinion the business requires it, the court of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kansas City v. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Hudgins v. Mooresville Consolidated School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  3. Francis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Milford BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Cutler v. HowardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gibson Ex Rel. Gibson v. Forest Hills Local School District Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  2. State Ex Rel. Greisinger v. Grand Rapids Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API