Legal Opinion

Broderick v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnthony M. Livoti, J.

This is an application to compel respondent to accept service of a notice of intention to file a claim under article 17-A of the Insurance Law.

Petitioner, while a pedestrian, was struck by the vehicle in question on February 22, 1961. His attorney sent a so-called claim letter to the driver (and owner) of the vehicle on February 27. By letter dated March 7, 1961, the driver replied in pertinent part as follows: “Inclose \_sic\ is a letter from my insurance Company but the insurance had not been fully paid *351and was not in benefit [sic] at the time of the accident. * * * I have stored the car…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Cappiello v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Pajak v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. McNeill v. Maryland Automobile Insurance FundCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API