Briarwood Club, LLC v. Vespera, LLC
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.
¶ 1. Courts exercising equitable powers must behave akin to doctors operating under the *65Hippocratic Oath: first, do no harm. We must do equity to all parties and not just the party seeking equitable assistance, within established rules and mindful of the maxim that "equity follows the law." 30A C.J.S. Equity § 135 (2013).
¶ 2. It is within this context that we examine the equitable doctrine of "marshaling assets." Briarwood Club, LLC, the holder of a subordinate mortgage, requests that the doctrine of marshaling assets be applied to the detriment of fellow creditor Waterstone Bank, which holds…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Moser Paper Co. v. North Shore Publishing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Richards v. Land Star Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- Andersen Yard Co. v. Citizens State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Gilbert v. CraneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Prezioso v. AertsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
- In re ThompsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2014