Legal Opinion

Davison County v. Watertown Tile & Construction Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1923No. File No. 5457PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGates, J.

This is an action brought by Davison county and its board of county commissioners upon a bond given to insure the faithful performance of a drainage contract pursuant to the provisions of section 8465, Rev. Code 1919. Davison county is the obligee named in the bond. The defendant surety company demurred to the complaint , upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and upon the ground that several causes of action were improperly united. The demurrer was overruled.. The surety company appeals.

The points made by appellant are:(a) “The bond upon which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. John W. Tuthill Lumber Co. v. McMackinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Woods Bros. Const. Co. v. Yankton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. GraffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Davison County v. Watertown Tide & Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Kaiser Trucking, Inc. v. Liberty MutualSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Davison County v. Watertown Tide & Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API