DAYTON RUBBER COMPANY v. Shaw

It is conceded in the plaintiff’s brief that the only disputed fact involved in this appeal is whether or not its claim has been handled in accordance with established' administrative procedure by the North Carolina Department of Revenue. In our opinion, the finding of fact by the court below on this question is supported by competent evidence and is, therefore, not reviewable on appeal. Ryan v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 235 N.C. 585, 70 S.E. 2d 853; Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577, 58 S.E. 2d 351; Scott & Co. v. Jones, 230 N.C. 74, 52 S.E. 2d 219. Consequently, the appeal only presents…