Legal Opinion

Atkinson Novelty Co. v. Prince & Son

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 14, 1922No. 12859PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Complaint; from Fannin superior court — Judge Blair. July 12, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

This is a suit upon an open account. The defendant filed a plea denying general liability, and also a special plea in which it alleged that the account sued upon was for a certain punch-board, and that the sale of the same was illegal and void, in that it involved the sale of property which was to be used in *498the hazarding of money and was a gambling scheme. The plaintiff demurred both generally and specially to the defendant’s answer. The defendant thereupon filed an amendment to its answer, setting forth more fully the reasons why the contract was illegal and void. The plaintiff moved to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrittenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. State v. TurlingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Small Grain Distilling Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  4. Grove Manufacturing Co. v. JacobsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Johnson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Crisp v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Bennett v. Atkinson Novelty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API