Jordan v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
McCORD, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for incest, the punishment being assessed at five years confinement in the penitentiary.
The State moves to dismiss the appeal because there is not a sufficient recognizance. Appellant in the court below, after his motion for new trial had .been overruled, entered into a recognizance in the sum of $3,500 conditioned that he would appear on the 3d day of January, 1910, or as may be directed or required <by the judge, and there remain from day to day and term to term of said court to answer the State of Texas, upon, a charge by indictment duly…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Baggett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Prince v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Estep v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- George William Huffman v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Huffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960