Legal Opinion

Jordan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 4, 1910No. 458PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

McCORD, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for incest, the punishment being assessed at five years confinement in the penitentiary.

The State moves to dismiss the appeal because there is not a sufficient recognizance. Appellant in the court below, after his motion for new trial had .been overruled, entered into a recognizance in the sum of $3,500 conditioned that he would appear on the 3d day of January, 1910, or as may be directed or required <by the judge, and there remain from day to day and term to term of said court to answer the State of Texas, upon, a charge by indictment duly…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baggett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Prince v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Estep v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. George William Huffman v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. Huffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API