Mitchell v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge TARANTO.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge PROST.
TARANTO, Circuit Judge.
This case involves a jurisdictional limit on the authority of the Merit Systems Protection Board to review an agency’s removal of a worker from her job. In late 2008, the Department of Justice hired Amy Mitchell as an Assistant United States Attorney. She began working while the required background investigation took place. When the investigation concluded about seven months later, the Department issued Ms. Mitchell a form stating that her appointment was subject to a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Warren S. Forest v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Van Wersch v. Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Andrew C. Eller, Jr. v. Office of Personnel Management, Merit Systems Protection Board2014
- Andrew C. Eller, Jr. v. Office of Personnel Management, Merit Systems Protection Board2014
- Avalos v. HudCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020