Legal Opinion

Hecker v. New-York Balance Dock Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1857PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application for judgment to abate a nuisance, and for an injunction. The facts will appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Roosevelt, Justice.

The plaintiffs, who are the owners of the Croton Mills, and a large amount of other real estate in the neighborhood of Pike Slip, on the East River, complain that the defendants, about a year ago, stationed in the slip a floating dock, permanently secured to one of the piers, greatly incommoding the plaintiffs’ business, increasing the expense of cartage, and impairing the value of their property, and they ask for a judgment of the court to abate “ the said nuisance,” as they call it, and to restrain the defendants, by injunction, from further obstructing or incumbering “…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. FerreiraSupreme Court of the United States · 1852

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Kate TremaineDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1871
  2. Hudson River Railroad v. LoebThe Superior Court of New York City · 1868
  3. In re State Reservation at NiagaraNew York Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Trenor v. JacksonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1873

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API