Legal Opinion

Bergerman v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 20, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.

The questions presented are (1) whether subdivision f of section B18-4.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York is valid or whether its provisions contravene section 1 of article VIII of the New York State Constitution, which prohibits a municipality from making gifts of public funds; and (2) if the statute is constitutional, whether defendants James E. Furey and Bernard A. Collins are entitled to the pension benefits provided thereunder.

The Special Term held that subdivision f of section B18-4.0 of the Administrative Code is unconstitutional as authorizing a gift of public funds.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matter of Giannettino v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Hoyt v. County of BroomeNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Matter of Wingate v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Hammitt v. GaynorNew York Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Kieran v. Hunter College Retirement BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Herreboudt v. Board of Education, New York County Courts1963
  2. Burton v. City of AlbanyNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Haag v. HogueNew York Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API