Legal Opinion

Howard v. Howard

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 29, 1940No. 7545PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VINSON, Associate Justice.

This is a special appeal from an order of the District Court denying the plaintiff (appellant) alimony pendente lite in an action for maintenance.

On August 4, 1938, the plaintiff filed her bill of complaint in the District Court praying for separate maintenance and support under § 75, Title 14 of the District Code. In addition to the usual allegations that she was the defendant’s (appel-lee’s) wife and that he refused to support her though able to do so, the plaintiff stated that she was enceinte and would therefore be compelled shortly to resign her employment.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. PedersenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Maschauer v. DownsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Lesh v. LeshCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1903
  4. Wedderburn v. WedderburnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1917
  5. Tolman v. TolmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Beach v. BeachCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Melvin v. MelvinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. Tasanilla Hopson v. Delores Palmer HopsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  4. Emrich v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  5. Jewell R. Mazique v. Edward C. MaziqueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API