Legal Opinion

Fokken v. Smith

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1931No. File No. 6822PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts', J.

Plaintiff brought this action to have an amount, which he claimed had been received by the defendant, State Bank & Trust Company, as the proceeds of a loan for the purpose of paying off a mortgage, declared to be a trust in possession of the superintendent of banks, who assumed charge of the defendant bank for the purposes of liquidation, two days after the money had been deposited for the purpose mentioned. Trial in the circuit court resulted in judgment in favor of the plaintiff, directing the payment of the amount received by the defendant bank from the plaintiff and interest thereon pro…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holmes v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Northwest Lumber Co. v. Scandinavian American BankWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Equitable Trust Co. of New York v. Connecticut Brass & Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  4. State Ex Rel. North Todd Gentry v. Page BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  5. Hallett v. FishDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commercial National Bank v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Strain v. Potter CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Bogue v. TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Farish v. HolleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API