Legal Opinion

Application of Guenther K. Hoeschele

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 6, 1969No. Patent Appeal 8118PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALMOND, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the final rejection of claims 1, 3, 4 and 5, 1 *****the sole claims of appellant’s application. 2

The invention relates to polyurethane elastomers said to have improved freeze-resistant properties. It is said that polyurethane elastomers prepared from poly-tetramethylene ether glycol (hereinafter PTME glycol) or polypropylene ether glycol (hereinafter PPE glycol) are unsatisfactory for many applications on industrial equipment which may be subjected to extremely low temperature, as in winter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re EisenhutCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  2. Application of Arthur P. ShepardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  3. Application of Marco PredaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  4. Application of Douglas H. MoretonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  5. Application of Fred Fortess and Werner A. P. SchoenebergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Esso Research & Engineering Co. v. Kahn & Company, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API