Legal Opinion

Panarello v. Segalla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 21, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to re*735cover a real estate broker’s commission, the defendant John A. Segalla appeals (1), as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess Count (Pagones, J.), dated October 1, 2001, as granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against him, (2) from a judgment of the same court, dated January 30, 2002, which, upon the order dated October 1, 2001, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $250,000, and (3), as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Dagar Group, Ltd. v. Hannaford Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Sholom & Zuckerbrot Realty Corp. v. Citibank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hammer v. GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API