Legal Opinion

Hammer v. Griffin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 13, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover a real estate broker’s commission, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Tolbert, J.), entered December 23, 2004, as denied his cross motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In this action to recover a real estate broker’s commission, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment on his complaint. “To earn a commission, a broker must prove that he or she had a contract, either express or implied,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dagar Group, Ltd. v. Hannaford Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Joseph P. Day Realty Corp. v. CheraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Sholom & Zuckerbrot Realty Corp. v. Citibank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Brown & Son Realty, Inc. v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Panarello v. SegallaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Steed v. JobeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API