Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Halliburton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1894No. 206PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Gonzales. Tried below before Hon. Geo. McCormick.

1Opinion of the Court

NEILL, Associate Justice.

This suit was brought by the appellee Halliburton against the appellee R. S. Parr, on a promissory note, which is substantially as follows:

“$1682.70. Waelder, Texas, February 11, 1889.
“Two hundred and twenty days after date I promise to pay to the order of T. H. Trippe and J. L. Halliburton, or either of them, $1682.70, at Waelder, Texas, with 10 per cent interest per annum from December 20, 1888, until paid, with 10 per cent additional if collected by law, as attorney fees. Value received.

[Signed] “R. S. Parr.”

There is a transfer endorsed on the note from Trippe to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morrill v. HoytTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Behrens v. DignowittyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carver v. J. S. Mayfield Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  2. D. O. McRimmon & Co. v. HartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API