Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Rosenzweig & Sons, Jewelers, Inc. v. Jones

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1937No. Civil No. 3768Published

1Concurrence

BOSS, J.,

Concurring. — I concur in the opinion of Justice LOCKWOOD, but feel that it goes too far and unnecessarily announces a rule that is unsound and if unchallenged might become fixed law in this state and defeat many righteous causes.

I do not think that, where the master is sued with his servant on the theory of respondeat superior for damages for the negligence of the servant, a verdict finding the issues against the master only is or should be treated as a finding that the servant was not negligent. It must be admitted that if there was a tort committed by the defendants against the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stith v. J. J. Newberry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Fowden v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Barnes v. AshworthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  4. Benson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Melzner v. Raven Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API