Rosenzweig & Sons, Jewelers, Inc. v. Jones
Arizona Supreme Court
1Concurrence
BOSS, J.,
Concurring. — I concur in the opinion of Justice LOCKWOOD, but feel that it goes too far and unnecessarily announces a rule that is unsound and if unchallenged might become fixed law in this state and defeat many righteous causes.
I do not think that, where the master is sued with his servant on the theory of respondeat superior for damages for the negligence of the servant, a verdict finding the issues against the master only is or should be treated as a finding that the servant was not negligent. It must be admitted that if there was a tort committed by the defendants against the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stith v. J. J. Newberry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Fowden v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Barnes v. AshworthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
- Benson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Melzner v. Raven Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.