Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Wiesenthal v. Denny

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1892No. 552PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. Action on the relation of P. V. Wiesenthal for a writ of mandate against the members of the city council of the city of Seattle, to compel said city council, as a canvassing board, to declare him elected a delegate to the city council from the Third ward of said city, at the election held March 8,1892.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J. —

The constitution, art. 11, § 10, provides that the freeholders’ charter of any city of the first class may be amended “by proposals therefor submitted by the legislative authority of such city to the electors thereof at any general election after notice of said submission, published as above specified (Wade v. Tacoma, ante, p. 85), and ratified by a majority of the qualified electors voting thereon.” Subdivision 38 of § 520, Gen. Stat., contains the only legislative reference to such amendment, by enumerating as among the express powers of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Varney v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Major v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. State Ex Rel. Linn v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Reeves v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Bedford v. ShillingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1818
  5. State ex rel. Latimer v. HenryWashington Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API