Woodhouse v. Rio Grande Railway Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Cameron. Tried below before the Hon. J. C.. Russell.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
This action was brought by appellant to recover the penalty imposed by the Act of April 10, 1883, on any railroad company, for unjust discrimination in freight charges, and to recover the sum alleged to have been demanded and paid in excess of that demanded of and paid by other persons.
The statute provides that “if any railroad company shall charge one person more for transporting freight of the same class, in equal or less quantities, over its road, for the same or a less distance, than it charges another for the same or a greater distance, all such discriminating…
2Cited by15 opinions
- East Line & Red River Railway Co. v. CulbersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Kousal v. Texas Power & Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
- Texas Interurban Ry. Co. v. HughesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Hallowell v. BorchersNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. Crawford, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.