Legal Opinion

Holben v. Midwest Emery Freight System, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 1981No. Civ. A. 81-18 ERIEPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEBER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff was injured when struck from the rear by a truck operated by an employee of defendant Haulmark Transport Systems. The answer of Haulmark admits that the operator was its employee acting within the course of his employment, thus making Haulmark vicariously liable for any negligence of its employee.

Plaintiff amended his complaint to add a cause of action against Haulmark for negligent entrustment because it knowingly allowed a driver whom it knew to be careless, reckless and negligent to operate its tractor-trailer. The amendment to the complaint asks for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Philip Cochetti v. John Desmond, Walter M. Phillips, Jr. And Robert P. KaneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  2. Bobby Breeding and Hugh Breeding, Inc. v. Ben Massey and Mrs. Ben MasseyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  3. Clark v. StewartOhio Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Andalon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Burke v. TransAm Trucking, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Barbagallo v. GregorySupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  4. Corrigan v. Methodist HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Andalon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API