State Ex Rel. Gutbrod v. Wolke
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
Basic to appellant’s position on these appeals is the contention that ch. 384 of the Laws of 1969 did not create sec. 161.30, Stats., because it referred to and by its terms amended provisions of sec. 151.07, which statute had, earlier in the same legislative session, been renumbered in ch. 336 of the Laws of 1969.
It is clear that there was in fact an error in the reference by number to the statute which was being amended in enactment of ch. 384. The sequence of events in the session went as follows:
Chapter 336 of the Laws of 1969 amended sec. 151.07, Stats., and renumbered it as sec. 450.07.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Amusement Co. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- State ex rel. McGrael v. PhelpsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Lynch v. ContaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Labor & Farm Party v. Elections BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. WachsmuthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. DuffyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- In Re Estate of HaeseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.