Monfils v. . Hazlewood
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtScheNCK, J.
This action having been instituted under the provisions of C. S., 160, it cannot be maintained by an administratrix of a foreign jurisdiction. Hall v. R. R., 146 N. C., 345; ibid, 149 N. C., 108. “No suit can be maintained upon a cause of action arising in tbis State by any person except an executor or administrator duly appointed by the local court.” Tieffenbrun v. Flannery, 198 N. C., 397. Actions for wrongful death instituted under the provisions of the statute, C. S., 160, since they exist only by virtue of the statute, must be instituted and prosecuted strictly in accord with the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Tieffenbrun v. FlannerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Hall v. Southern R. R. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Hall v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Morefield v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tolson v. HodgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- Graves v. WelbornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Burcl v. North Carolina Baptist Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State Ex Rel. East Lenoir Sanitary District v. City of LenoirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Johnson v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.