People v. Osorio
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARONSON, J.
Defendant Edgar Omar Osorio challenges his conviction for murder, arson, robbery, and burglary. Osorio contends the admission of a victim’s out-of-court statements describing her attacker violated his right to confrontation under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Crawford v. Washington (2004) 541 U.S. 36 [158 L.Ed.2d 177, 124 S.Ct. 1354] (Crawford). He also contends the trial court erred in failing to stay a 10-year gang enhancement because the court stayed the sentence on the underlying offense.
In the published…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Giles v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- People v. WaidlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. FranklinTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. BlacksherCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Parker v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Lin v. JengCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. BaldwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.