Legal Opinion

D'Angelo v. Vanguard Group, Inc., individually and d/b/a Vanguard

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 2022No. 2:21-cv-04813Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN J. D’ANGELO : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 21-4813 : VANGUARD GROUP, INC. : MEMORANDUM KEARNEY, J. November 10, 2022 A fifty-year-old employee can allege his new boss fired him because of his age when the employer hires a substantially younger employee to perform the same job. But the terminated employee needs to eventually adduce evidence of the employer’s discriminatory animus based upon age. Judges will test allegations for supporting facts before summoning citizens for a jury. Allegations without evidence…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Antonio Pearson v. Prison Health ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API