Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Jamison

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Adams, J. cited: Spaulding v. Suss, 4 Mo. App. 542; Qreenbaum v. Elliott, 60 Mo. 25. cited: North v. Walker, 66 Mo. 453; Pheiffer v. Suss, 5 Mo. App. 590; Williamson v. Anthony, 47 Mo. 299.

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

It appears from the evidence in this case that Blow died in August, 1875, and letters of administration, dated October 13, 1875, were granted to Jamison, who duly gave the notice required by the statute. Blow, at the time of his death, owed Labeaume an amount of money represented by a principal note of $20,000, payable ten years after date, and semi-annual interest-notes, at the rate of eight per cent per annum. These notes were all dated November 19, 1868. Labeaume lived in France. Booth was the agent of Labeaume, and attended to his business in St. Louis. All the interest-notes maturing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Greenabaum v. ElliottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  2. State ex rel. Rosenblatt v. HemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  3. Spaulding v. SussMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. North v. Walker's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  5. Fairchild v. Masonic Hall Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gould v. HeadU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1890
  2. Douglass v. FolsomNevada Supreme Court · 1893
  3. City of Westport ex rel. Tomb v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Garesché v. LewisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API