Legal Opinion

Manson v. Foltz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1932No. 23878. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

— By this action, plaintiff seeks relief from a decree, rendered in a former action, which can-celled and forfeited a real estate contract wherein defendants were vendors and plaintiff was vendee. The complaint herein consists of five separate causes of action. Defendants ’ demurrer to each of the causes of action was sustained. Plaintiff elected to stand upon his complaint, whereupon the court entered a judgment of dismissal with prejudice, from which plaintiff has appealed.

On April 14, 1923, Foltz and wife, as vendors, entered into a contract with Manson, as vendee, for the sale by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Surry v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Foltz v. MansonWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vail v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API