Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hollingsworth Ex Rel. Hollingsworth v. Burns

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 29, 1936Published

1DissentStacy, C. J.

When a 13-year-old plaintiff, who is held competent to testify as a witness, admits on the stand, under examination by the court, “I realized that I ought not to go out in the street. ... I thought I could make it and missed it,” What is the effect of such testimony? Clearly, if this evidence be given its usual significance, the plaintiff cannot recover. He proves himself *44out of court. Lincoln v. R. R., 207 N. C., 787, 178 S. E., 601. lie says he knowingly took a chance and lost. Stamey v. R. R., 208 N. C., 668, 182 S. E., 130. The judge so stated in charging the jury, but left it to them to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. State v. . SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Lloyd v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. State v. . AbernethySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. State v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API