Legal Opinion

Blakely v. Fort Lyon Canal Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1903No. 4204; No. 4252PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to and Appeal from the District Court of Bent County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

The questions involved in these cases grew out of the judgment of the lower court rendered in an action brought by defendant in error and appellee against plaintiff in error and appellants, to cancel water rights claimed by them in what is now known as The Fort Lyon Canal. Several of the propositions presented for determination are the same in each case, and they will, therefore, be considered together.

The basis of plaintiff’s claim, as stated in the complaint filed in the court below, is, that the water rights in controversy (excepting those held by the Henry and Porter Investment Companies)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Town of Fairplay v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
  3. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co. v. WyattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  4. Allen v. MooreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Willow River Water Users Ass'n v. Orchards Water Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Butte Co. W. U. Assn. v. Railroad Com.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Reed v. RichardsonMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Connell v. CliffordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  5. Butte Cty. Water Users' Ass'n v. R.R. Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API