Aasma v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
Pending before this Court is Defendants’ Motion for Order to Confirm Foreign Arbitral Award and to Enter Judgment (Doc. No. 89). For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion will be granted.
J. BACKGROUND
This matter arises from suits filed by merchant seaman who were employed by the now largely defunct States Steamship Company (“States”). Plaintiffs claim they were injured by exposure to asbestos during their service aboard States’ vessels. Relative to the instant action, States was insured by two protection and indemnity associations, 1 including…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- International Standard Electric Corp. v. Bridas Sociedad Anonima Petrolera, Industrial Y ComercialDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Psarianos v. Standard Marine, Ltd., Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1989
- Indocomex Fibres PTE., Ltd. v. Cotton Co. International Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1996
- CBS Corp. v. Wak Orient Power & Light Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
3Cited by2 opinions
- Beijing Dayou Dingxin Investment Management Partnership, L.P. v. WangDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
- Rossisa Participacoes v. Reynolds and Reynolds CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019