Legal Opinion

Aasma v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 8, 2003No. 1:90 CV 2280PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KATZ, District Judge.

Pending before this Court is Defendants’ Motion for Order to Confirm Foreign Arbitral Award and to Enter Judgment (Doc. No. 89). For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion will be granted.

J. BACKGROUND

This matter arises from suits filed by merchant seaman who were employed by the now largely defunct States Steamship Company (“States”). Plaintiffs claim they were injured by exposure to asbestos during their service aboard States’ vessels. Relative to the instant action, States was insured by two protection and indemnity associations, 1 including…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. International Standard Electric Corp. v. Bridas Sociedad Anonima Petrolera, Industrial Y ComercialDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  3. Psarianos v. Standard Marine, Ltd., Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1989
  4. Indocomex Fibres PTE., Ltd. v. Cotton Co. International Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1996
  5. CBS Corp. v. Wak Orient Power & Light Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beijing Dayou Dingxin Investment Management Partnership, L.P. v. WangDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
  2. Rossisa Participacoes v. Reynolds and Reynolds CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API