Legal Opinion

CBS Corp. v. Wak Orient Power & Light Ltd.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 2001No. CIV. A. 99-2996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GILES, Chief Judge.

Pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 207, Plaintiffs move this court to confirm the arbitral award rendered by the International Chamber of Commerce’s International Court of Arbitration in Siemens Westinghouse Service Company, Ltd., Raytheon-Ebasco Overseas Ltd., and CBS Corporation v. WAK Orient Power & Light Limited, Case No. 10104/AC/DB., to enter judgment in accordance with that award, and to enjoin defendant from attempting to register any foreign judgment in any court of this country that may be arguably based on the subject matter of the arbitral award. Defendant has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Baker v. GotzDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1976
  3. Ministry of Defense of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Gould, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. American Construction MacHinery & Equipment Corp. v. Mechanised Construction of Pakistan Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aasma v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & IndemnityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
  2. Beijing Dayou Dingxin Investment Management Partnership, L.P. v. WangDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API