Legal Opinion

Callaham v. Carlson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 15, 1951No. 33639, 33646PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

The plaintiff contends that the defendants were guilty of negligence per se in that they failed to raise the fourth floor hoistway gate to the elevator in question to a height of 66 inches as required by the city ordinance concerning elevators. This contention might be based on two theories. First, it could be based on the theory that the American Standard Safety Code for elevators, which was adopted by the City of Atlanta as the legal code for the city in the ordinance of 1938, required hoistway gates existing at the time of the adoption of the ordinance to be raised to 66 inches. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Lamar v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Cooper v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Aycock v. Peaslee-Gaulbert Paint & Varnish Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Early v. Houser & HouserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harper v. DeFreitasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. James v. AlbertsMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Bogart v. HesterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Thomason v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Greene v. Piedmont Janitorial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API