Legal Opinion
Grady Properties Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 7, 1991No. 89-6392PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, Grady Properties Company challenges the district court's granting summary judgment in favor of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), foreclosing its attempt to offset promissory notes against unrelated accounts receivable. Finding no error in the court’s analysis, we affirm.
The parties stipulated to the facts. From 1984 through 1987, the law firm of Ferguson, Horn, Lawson & Heck (the Law Firm), provided legal services to Universal Savings Association (Universal I), generating accounts receivable in the amount of $73,018.29 for attorney…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- McMahon v. McDowellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Twin City Savings, Fsa v. Robert L. McCullough and Mary Nan McCulloughCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Mademoiselle Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Grady Properties Company v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Defendant/third-Party v. Fh & L Investments, an Oklahoma General Partnership Donald P. Ferguson Donald H. Horn and Ronald H. Lawson Individually and as General Partners of Fh & L Investments Ronald H. Lawson and Karen A. Lawson, Husband and Wife, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991