Legal Opinion

McNatt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 11, 1936No. 18017PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of accepting a bribe, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

The record is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. The only contention which the appellant makes is that the court erred in overruling his motion in arrest of judgment because of a defective indictment: “that Wylie McNatt, on or about the 31st day of July A. D. 1934, and anterior to the presentment of this indictment in the county of Fayette and the State of Texas, was a duly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Minter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Burnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hadnot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  2. Hadnot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Joe Martinez Natal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API