Legal Opinion

Shell Development Co. v. Watson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 14, 1957No. Civ. A. 3264-54, 3386-56PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

The Court has before it two actions under 35 U.S.C. § 145, which have been consolidated for trial, against the Commissioner of Patents, to secure an adjudication that the plaintiff is entitled to receive a patent for inventions owned by it as specified in the claims involved in the two actions, each action having been brought in respect to a separate application for a patent.

The invention consists of a compound of fuel gasoline used for internal combustion engines, with a chemical, the purpose of which is to do away with the fouling of spark plugs. The problem to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Traitel Marble Co. v. U. T. Hunger-Ford Brass & Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Company v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963
  2. General Tire and Rubber Company v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960
  3. Armour Pharmaceutical Co. v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1967
  4. Hoerr v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957
  5. Magic Fingers, Inc. v. AugerDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API