Legal Opinion

University of Vermont v. W.R. Grace & Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 4, 1989No. 88-181PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The issue presented by this case is whether the statute of limitations, in a product liability action alleging property damage due to asbestos contamination, begins to run from the time the product was purchased and installed or from the moment the damage was or should have been discovered. The trial court, measuring from the former, entered summary judgment for defendant on the ground that plaintiff’s claims were barred by the six-year statute of limitations as provided in 12 V.S.A. § 511. 1 We reverse and remand.

Defendant manufactured Mono-Kote 3 (MK 3), which is sprayed on surfaces to make…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foil v. BallingerUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Levy v. Town of St. Albans Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. Heath v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Cavanaugh v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  5. Murray v. AllenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  2. In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  3. Hebron Public School District No. 13 of Morton County v. United States Gypsum Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In re Estate of Alden v. Alden v. AldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. Leo v. HillmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API