Legal Opinion

Estate of Smith v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided April 18, 1951No. Docket Nos. 102344, 102725PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

ARundeix, Judge:

We find no need to enter upon a discussion of the petitioners’ contentions that the Commissioner has failed to establish the insolvency of Southern and Atlantic and Empire and Bay States and has not exhausted all reasonable legal remedies for the collection of the tax from those companies before proceeding against the petitioners as transferees,' for these same questions were considered and decided adversely to the petitioners in Samuel Wilcox, 16 T. C. 572.

However, -the petitioners have advanced a secondary defense to transferee liability. Petitioners point out that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Burnet v. San Joaquin Fruit & Investment Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  3. Wilcox v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Segura v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  2. Estate of Work v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  3. Work v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  4. Segura v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  5. Work v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API