Legal Opinion

Burnet v. San Joaquin Fruit & Investment Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1931No. 6346PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition for review of a decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals. The facts, as stated in the opinion and findings of the Board, are as follows;

“Under date of July 21, 1925, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue sent a deficiency notice to the San Joaquin Fruit & Investment Company of Tustin, California, the petitioner herein, in which he stated:
“ ‘The determination of your income tax liability for the years 1918 and 1919 has resulted in a deficiency in tax aggregating $111,281.07, as set forth in Bureau letters dated. March 9, 1925, and April 22,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. United States v. UpdikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Nauts v. ClymerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Olsen v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  4. Clifford O. Boren v. R. A. Riddell, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. Ventura Consolidated Oil Fields v. RoganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API