Legal Opinion
Burnet v. San Joaquin Fruit & Investment Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 22, 1931No. 6346PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition for review of a decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals. The facts, as stated in the opinion and findings of the Board, are as follows;
“Under date of July 21, 1925, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue sent a deficiency notice to the San Joaquin Fruit & Investment Company of Tustin, California, the petitioner herein, in which he stated:
“ ‘The determination of your income tax liability for the years 1918 and 1919 has resulted in a deficiency in tax aggregating $111,281.07, as set forth in Bureau letters dated. March 9, 1925, and April 22,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States v. UpdikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Nauts v. ClymerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
3Cited by26 opinions
- Olsen v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Clifford O. Boren v. R. A. Riddell, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Ventura Consolidated Oil Fields v. RoganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.