Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. Hays

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 26, 1913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the facts as above).

The first call in the deed offered in evidence is for the beginning point to be “at Driskell survey a stake.” The second call is “thence east with said survey 1284 varas a stake, being Driskell’s southwest corner.” The first call is very imperfect, from not giving a more certain and distinct starting corner on the Driskell survey. The second call does distinctly and with certainty locate and fix the end of its line to be at the southwest corner of the Driskell survey. In order to run a line east to reach the southwest corner of the Driskell survey, the point…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Booth v. UpshurTexas Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Phillips v. AyresTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Flanagan v. BoggessTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Udell v. PeakTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Smith v. ChathamTexas Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. U. S. Enterprises, Inc. v. DauleyTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Battle v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Thomas v. Southwestern Settlement & Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Hays v. HinkleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Wyman v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API