Legal Opinion

Hays v. Hinkle

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1917No. 1678PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the first assignment of error it is contended that the court erred in admitting in evidence the deed from Wyngate Truitt to T. B. McReynolds, of date August 30, 1860. It is thought that this deed is not void, as was heretofore ruled, for insufficiency of description of the land. Hinkle v. Hays, 162 S.W. 435. And there is evidence tending to show that the description of the land purported to be passed by the deed applies on the ground to the land sued for. Therefore this assignment, and also the second assignment of error, are overruled.

The appellant made a statutory demand, before the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Craig v. CartwrightTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Bringhurst v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. McDonough v. Jefferson CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Skov v. CoffinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Brenton & McKay v. PeckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. McCraw v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Davis v. DowlenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Thomas v. Southwestern Settlement & Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Francis v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API