Legal Opinion

Bank of Indian Territory v. Eckles

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 5, 1907PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the District Court of Comanche'County j before F. E. Gillette, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burford, C. J.:

The ICiowa, Comanche, and Apache Indian country was opened to settlement on August 6, 1901, and Comanche county is composed of territory which originally was a portion of said Indian reservation. The county government was organized immediately after the opening of said reservation to white settlement, and W. W. Painter w;as by the governor appointed and qualified as sherifE of said county, and proceeded to discharge the duties of said office until his successor was elected and qualified in January, 1903. This proceding is for a peremptory writ of mandamus…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  2. Ashe v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Beekman v. Van DolsenNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frey v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1925
  2. Anderson v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Weinberg Co. v. HellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Phillips & Stong Engineering Co. v. Howard B. James Associates, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
  5. Williams & Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API