Legal Opinion

United States v. Uriah Marxen

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 14, 2005No. 04-6053PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REEVES, District Judge.

The United States appeals the district court’s order suppressing evidence seized following a traffic stop of Appellee Uriah Marxen’s vehicle and statements that Marxen made following his arrest. Because we conclude that the district court erred in suppressing the subject evidence and statements, we reverse the district court’s determination and remand this action for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

On August 3, 2002, two persons described as a tall, thin black man and a white woman committed an armed robbery of a Dairy Mart convenience store located on Bardstown…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Floyd v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Patrick WintersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. GarridoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API