Legal Opinion
Miceli v. Ansell, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided October 21, 1998No. 2:98-cv-00134PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LOZANO, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant, Ansell, Inc.’s, Motion to Dismiss, filed on June 29, 1998. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
Karin Miceli (“Karen”) and John Miceli (together “Plaintiffs”) are citizens of Indiana. On or about May 11,1997, Plaintiffs allegedly purchased and used a condom manufactured by Ansell, Inc. (“Defendant”) in Chicago, Illinois. Defendant is an Alabama corporation with its principal place of business in Alabama. According to Plaintiff, this condom had a hole in it, and as a result Karin became…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mavourneen Doherty v. City of Chicago, Graham C. Grady, Judith C. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Perkins v. SilversteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Dale S. Rice v. Nova Biomedical Corporation and Robert ChristopherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Cowe Ex Rel. Cowe v. Forum Group, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sheila Ritchie v. Glidden Company, Ici Paints World-Group and Graco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Ritchie, Sheila v. Glidden CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001