Legal Opinion

Deisher v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 13, 1916No. 4308PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of rape upon a girl less than thirteen years and one month of age, and his punishment assessed at the lowest prescribed by law.

The evidence was amply sufficient to sustain the conviction. Appellant in no way by his assignments or brief contends otherwise.

Will Strong and Jim Head were important State’s witnesses against appellant, and he knew it. The State had the right, therefore, to prove by Mr. Bennett, the father of the assaulted girl, that appellant in discussing with him said witnesses in connection with his case, or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mooney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Warthan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  3. Hart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  5. Holliday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The People v. BloomIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Roberson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Baimbridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API