Legal Opinion

Smith v. Inland Paperboard Packaging, 2007-P-0088 (12-31-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 2008No. 2007-P-0088PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Quentin A. Cottrell appeals from the grant of summary judgment by the Portage County Court of Common Pleas to Temple-Inland, Inc., d.b.a. Inland Paperboard and Packaging, Inc., Hayward Gillespie, Austin Crane, and Eric Bissler on his employer intentional tort claim. We affirm.

{¶ 2} September 29, 2003, Mr. Cottrell was working as the assistant operator of a Ward printer/slotter Model 17000 at Inland's facility in Streetsboro. The machine's internal designation at Inland was Machine No. EG-122. The EG-122 cuts, folds, glues and prints paperboard boxes in one operation. Mr. Cottrell…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Yeaples v. Gall (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Godwin v. Facebook, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Rose v. CochranOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Speigel v. IanniOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. Thomas v. State Farm Auto. Mut. Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API